Can I Have Another Account?

[CrownRoyalEquestrian]

So I have two accounts. One is my main, everything happens there. The other is where I retire out my stallions to extend breeding time - because I do so many turns and they get bred out really quick, so I like to slow that down a LOT. I have a breeding partner with another player (because that's all she does and she does way faster turns than even I do - I do so much training, I'm lucky to see a foal about 1-2 a week). But I would like to have a breeding account myself, personally. I feel like I'm putting too much weight on her and we're having a great time - she just likes to breed horses. But I get crazy sidetracked. I'm obsessed with Vanners - threw those at her because I wasn't aging them as quick as I'd like. And now I have paints.

[BlackOak2]

So I have two accounts. One is my main, everything happens there. The other is where I retire out my stallions to extend breeding time - because I do so many turns and they get bred out really quick, so I like to slow that down a LOT. I have a breeding partner with another player (because that's all she does and she does way faster turns than even I do - I do so much training, I'm lucky to see a foal about 1-2 a week). But I would like to have a breeding account myself, personally. I feel like I'm putting too much weight on her and we're having a great time - she just likes to breed horses. But I get crazy sidetracked. I'm obsessed with Vanners - threw those at her because I wasn't aging them as quick as I'd like. And now I have paints.

By admin rule, we are each allowed two accounts.
You'll have to choose what you want to focus on and for how long. You can certainly change your focus. If you make goals, once you achieve them, it's much easier to move from one goal to another.

I chose not to have a frozen account. Thus, I cannot freeze any stallion or mare at any point in time. This allows me to have more projects running at the same time. But this was my choice and the way I found was best for me and my gameplay. You'll have to make that choice yourself, or change your choice if it's not working out for you.

Good Luck!

[CrownRoyalEquestrian]

Oh I don't have a frozen account. I was around just before the breeding energy turned over and I make sure my studs are at 100% or available for breeding. I just take so many turns that I like to slow that down as much as possible. And I do fully believe in phasing out my lower HGP studs. I do it all the time. I'm always pushing for higher and higher HGP and good conformation.

[BlackOak2]

Oh I don't have a frozen account. I was around just before the breeding energy turned over and I make sure my studs are at 100% or available for breeding. I just take so many turns that I like to slow that down as much as possible. And I do fully believe in phasing out my lower HGP studs. I do it all the time. I'm always pushing for higher and higher HGP and good conformation.

I apologize, I used the term frozen account to indeed mean horse's that are kept around 'permanently'. However, since the new upgrade uses energy, I suppose the new definition of frozen account should mean permanent or semi-permanent horses; long-term use horses.

But my suggestion still exists. Lower HGP studs do have a place. And remember, just because you have a very high HGP horse, doesn't mean that it will always win out over a lower horse.

What I could suggest for you, is to give your studs a much more regular revolving door to your slower-turn farm. What I mean is, give each stallion a personalized goal for it to achieve. For instance, if it has red strength, then it must throw a colt with average strength, then the stud can be retired out of the slower-turn farm and age out. Or maybe give the stud eight foals as the 'trial' run, take a look at his production and if his production is less than what you expect or not quite meeting the goals you've set, then you can put him on the fast track out of your programs. This will move horses into and out of your fast farm perhaps a little quicker, opening more room for other projects.

I don't know if that will work for you or if you've already implemented something like that. The only other option is to decide which side project can be put on hold, or given up entirely. Or you could use your slower-turn farm for a slower project.