Skewed evaluation rating?
I don't know if this should be under bugs instead but I have noticed how people are referring their horses as 5 star rating for a certain breed (when there are just four different criteria that are evaluated) and I went to check and test the evaluation function to see if I had missed something.
What I found is that if a horse gets poor rating in all four criteria, the overall rating gets a red notice that says N/A. My first question is if it shouldn't say 0 instead of N/A?
I continued to test for other breeds on different horses and if a horse gets 1 good rating and 3 bad the overall number says 2. If a horse gets 2 good ratings and 2 bad the overall number says 3 and so on.
Even though there are just 4 criteria it seems like 1 is added to the overall number as long as a horse gets at least one good rating, making the evaluation ratings skewed to show ratings of 0 (N/A) and 2-5.
What I found is that if a horse gets poor rating in all four criteria, the overall rating gets a red notice that says N/A. My first question is if it shouldn't say 0 instead of N/A?
I continued to test for other breeds on different horses and if a horse gets 1 good rating and 3 bad the overall number says 2. If a horse gets 2 good ratings and 2 bad the overall number says 3 and so on.
Even though there are just 4 criteria it seems like 1 is added to the overall number as long as a horse gets at least one good rating, making the evaluation ratings skewed to show ratings of 0 (N/A) and 2-5.
Re: Skewed evaluation rating?
Yes it is skewed. It is mentioned in the bugs forum, though the topic is nearly a year old: http://www.horseworldonline.net/forum/v ... f=4&t=4411
1 seemed to disappear when the stars did.
1 seemed to disappear when the stars did.