Competition Project Now Complete - will post project result soon

[Parsnip]

...

I am assuming you want both awards to go to the front account 'Parsnip'. See reply above for breakdown of winnings.
The final award total for the Parsnip account and the Kelpie account combined is $130,000.

Please link an acceptable horse, or we can double-transfer the following horse:
http://www.horseworldonline.net/horse/profile/1869080

Thanks. colt

Results should be interesting. The biggest surprise for me was just how well Black Sea did. And Warped Tour did worse than I thought. Breeder's reports clearly aren't everything.

[BlackOak2]

See above for breakdown of winnings.

Please put the following mare back up and I can send you your winnings.

http://www.horseworldonline.net/horse/profile/2096454

Okay, she is up. Thanks for letting me help!

Kamichi

I included some additional fees that hadn't been transferred to you yet, on top of the award winnings at the end, and an additional thank you.

[BlackOak2]

I am assuming you want both awards to go to the front account 'Parsnip'. See reply above for breakdown of winnings.
The final award total for the Parsnip account and the Kelpie account combined is $130,000.

Please link an acceptable horse, or we can double-transfer the following horse:
http://www.horseworldonline.net/horse/profile/1869080

Thanks.
Results should be interesting. The biggest surprise for me was just how well Black Sea did. And Warped Tour did worse than I thought. Breeder's reports clearly aren't everything.

When I finish the formal write-up, I will ping you and the other three volunteers so none of you miss it.

One big thing I did find out, and I knew something wasn't right at the beginning (which is the reason I needed the test), was the math wasn't adding up to what I thought it should. The break-down of potential earnings versus losses for the hosting agent in either the Alpha or Beta sets just kept confusing me. They certainly had a reason to as well.It turns out that the Beta set (which I was hoping for), does break even, or just about breaks even, with no additional entries from other players... those outside of the entry into the event... that may not make much sense, but when the write-up is done, it should make much better sense.
And the Alpha set only shows a loss for the host of about 25% without additional non-event entrants.
So my math on the host's outcome was certainly skewed badly. I had both as losses, but the Beta at only half as much as the Alpha. I'm not yet sure where my math went wrong though... yet.
This part isn't correct yet... I'm still working through the math, for yet another time. hah! I'll get this right.

Breeder's reports certainly aren't everything! That section, though I understand it enough, I still get surprised when a horse I thought would do worse, does better then a 'top candidate'. So much so that my own competition line... if I like the horse enough to keep, they get fully tested on everything still! It does certainly help keep me straight in at least that project! Hah!

[WinterSage]

...

See above for breakdown of winnings.
You can link a horse you have no use for (I will age out only), or you can accept the following horse and post it again for the award winnings.

http://www.horseworldonline.net/horse/profile/2096396

He’s back up now!

[BlackOak2]

See above for breakdown of winnings.
You can link a horse you have no use for (I will age out only), or you can accept the following horse and post it again for the award winnings.

http://www.horseworldonline.net/horse/profile/2096396

He’s back up now!

Sorry I didn't respond immediately, the math on the project had me questioning myself again!
But I got it straight now.
I applied the awards.